Product overview

One workflow: screen conflicts with evidence

Search everywhere a name can hide, triage risk, and keep a defensible record — all in one workflow.

Request pricingRequest evaluation

Vett provides decision-support; counsel and the firm apply policy and the Rules.

Directory, cases, and documents together

Multi-source search

Conflict screening only works when you search everywhere a name can appear. Vett queries your firm directory, matter roles, and uploaded documents in one pass—so aliases, maiden names, DBAs, and lateral employment show up next to case involvement.

  • Unified search across people, firms, case parties, and document entities
  • Alias and nickname matching for directory-style screening
  • Employment and firm history surfaced alongside matters
  • Fast results designed for intake and lateral onboarding
Conflict check
3 results
Directory

Patricia Navarro — Associate, Bergman & Cole

Warning
Case

Opposing party on Navarro v. Lakeview Partners

Critical
Document

Mentioned in settlement_agreement_2023.pdf

Clear
3 sources searched in one pass
Evidence from the full text

AI document scanning

Upload contracts and filings or connect ingestion from your stack. AI extracts people and organizations from the body of each document—so a conflict mentioned only in an old filing still appears as searchable evidence.

  • Entity extraction from PDFs and text uploads
  • Chunk-level retrieval so mentions tie back to source files
  • Integrations and bulk paths as your deployment grows
  • Supports the document side of the same workflow as the landing page demo
❯_Document processing
  • engagement_letter_2024.pdf

    Processing...

  • Extracting entities...
  • Found: 4 people, 2 organizations
  • Indexed 12 searchable chunks
>> Entities now appear in conflict searches
Critical, Warning, Clear—screening language

Risk classification

Matches are labeled for review under familiar professional-responsibility themes (e.g. current vs former clients, imputation). Vett is decision-support: your firm applies policy, waivers, and the Model Rules.

  • Critical / Warning / Clear-style signals for triage
  • Explanations framed as screening notes, not legal conclusions
  • Consistent with how attorneys discuss Model Rules 1.7, 1.9, and 1.10
  • Designed for partner or committee review with context
Risk triage
  • CriticalRobert Callahan

    Current client on active matter — direct conflict under Rule 1.7

  • WarningRobert Callahan

    Former associate at opposing firm — imputation review under Rule 1.10

  • ClearCallahan & Reeves LLP

    Name match only — no adverse relationship found

Screening labels for partner review
A record for the ethics file

Audit trail & reports

Every conflict check can be saved with search terms and results. Printable output supports diligence and internal documentation—without claiming insurer approval or guaranteed outcomes.

  • Saved checks with timestamps and performer context
  • Printable / shareable reports for internal files
  • History for repeat searches and matter reopening
  • Clear decision-support disclaimer in-product
Conflict check #2041
Search saved

April 1, 2026 at 4:32 PM · 3 terms searched

Reviewed by J. Smith

Senior Partner · Acknowledged with notes

Report generated

Printable PDF — search terms, results, timestamps

Decision-support record for the ethics file

Ready for a scoped conversation

Request pricing or an evaluation—we will coordinate next steps with your firm.

Request pricingRequest evaluation